Myths of neutrality

Myths of neutrality

Arne Ruth
Former Editor-in-chief, Dagens Nyheter.

At the end of the War, Sweden and Switzerland were accused of using their neutrality for enrichment and not, as they had maintained, as a way of participating in the epochal struggle for the future of the human race. Switzerland faced the particular charge of unconditionally accepting to keep looted gold from Germany in its banks… Swedish trade with Germany, at least from 1943 onwards, helped to prolong the war. From this perspective, the wartime Swedish coalition government can be accused of indirectly adding to the impact of the Holocaust.

IWR innerpages 0209 42

This essay is only available for subscribers.

Download PDF or subscribe.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • NewsVine

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv Enabled

IWR WEB 2.0

READER-SUPPORTED JOURNALISM

Journalism at Independent World Report is directly and solely supported by individual yearly subscriptions to our print edition. By subscribing, you will directly contribute to our mission of reporting the forgotten and untold stories of the world. Since we are a reader-supported magazine, your subscription alone will support this independent publication.
Log in - BlogNews Theme by Gabfire themes